Trademark Wars: Tinder vs. Bumble, Part 1. Dating software company Tinder is showing no want to rival Bumble, and contains filed case alleging that Bumble is infringing it is patent, it is trademarks, and stealing trade secrets.

Trademark Wars: Tinder vs. Bumble, Part 1. Dating software company Tinder is showing no want to rival Bumble, and contains filed case alleging that Bumble is infringing it is patent, it is trademarks, and stealing trade secrets.

That’s a whole lotta suing, and today I’ll speak about the trademark infringement problem. Me and I’ll cover the other aspects of this lover’s quarrel if you want to hear about the other issues, just message.

Tinder, Inc, who owns the mark, came your can purchase the mark ( Registration quantity 4465926 ) following the mark ended up being used in Tinder on February 27th, 2015 by a business called SpeedDate.com LLC. A perusal associated with the record offers no hint as to the reasons the mark was moved, but provided Tinder, Inc.’s aggressive stance, we suspect some bullying behavior on Tinder’s component had been active in the deal. Big organizations usually get trademark liberties by less-than-ethical means when faced with smaller trademark holders whom can’t manage to reduce the chances of this kind of predatory behavior. But we digress…

In it is dating app “will continue to cause a likelihood of confusion” in members of the general public in it’s 45-page complaint, Match.com, the parent company of Tinder, alleges that Bumble’s use of the word “swipe. We see a couple of of dilemmas right here, both well worth noting.

Problem one is the allegation of “use.” Tinder acquired its trademark from another business, SpeedDate LLC, and not needed to prove “use” during the trademark enrollment proceedings. This means their claims of “use” regarding the trademark have not been scrutinized by the Patent and Trademark workplace. The initial enrollment had been for a dating app named “Swipe.” The usage the mark SWIPE to recognize the origin for the dating application is bona-fide trademark usage for a dating application.

Having been a user that is recent of Tinder software, I can’t state that we remember ever seeing the mark SWIPE utilized in conjunction utilizing the goods advertised into the trademark enrollment. This claimed “use” is not “use” of the mark in commerce as the Lanham Act requires while Tinder does indeed use the word “swipe” to describe the gesture of swiping one’s finger across the screen. A review of the alt.com Tinder site reveals that they’re utilizing the term “swipe” as a verb, and trademarks are adjectives, rather than verbs, nouns, or other element of message. They may not be utilizing the term “swipe” as a source identifier, once the original applicant did. The initial application ended up being for a credit card applicatoin called Swipe, or a “Swipe (adjective) application.” Tinder is making use of the term as a verb: “Swipe straight to like someone or swipe left to pass through.” It is not utilization of the mark as a trademark. Their trademark infringement claims against Bumble should fail because of this good explanation alone.

a study of Bumble ’s use likewise negates the claim that Bumble is making use of the definition of “swipe” as a trademark. Bumble’s web site makes use of the definition of “swipe” to spell it out the motion one makes to accept or dismiss a potential suitor, and use associated with the trademark as a verb isn’t trademark “use.” Just uttering the phrase “swipe” or making use of the word “swipe” — that will be a generic description of a gesture widely used on mobile devices — isn’t “use of a mark in commerce” which can be just what the Lanham Act protects. Of course, we disagree that Tinder has any claim into the term “swipe,” it is ownership of a registered trademark notwithstanding. We’ll have actually to hold back to check out the way the court guidelines on that issue.

To help expand complicate issues, it seems that Tinder’s parent company Match.com and Bumble had been negotiating the purchase of Bumble to Match.com , and therefore Match.com may used information that is confidential of these negotiations to bolster their claims of patent infringement, trademark infringement, and theft of trade secrets. For the part, Bumble alleges that the Match.com lawsuit ended up being filed to lessen the valuation of this business in order that Match.com could scoop it at a bargain cost. I’m guessing that discusses purchase are from the dining table. Bumble has Match.com that is counter-sued for400 million in damages, in addition to injunctive relief that will avoid Match.com from making use of information gleaned into the purchase negotiations within their infringement lawsuit.

I’ll be interested to start to see the results of this full situation, which may simply take months or years to grind its method through Federal court. I’ll problem an update as soon as the instance is set.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *